Date: 01-02-23  Time: 23:19 PM

Author Topic: gcc11  (Read 4030 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Michael

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1339
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: gcc11
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2022, 11:25:02 AM »
I have not been working on gcc. Was frustrated that I could not rebuild what I had built before.

Next week - I might have time to investigate again. Priority #1 is finish my presentation for COMMON Europe, next month.

yuzhichang

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: gcc11
« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2022, 06:34:58 AM »
Did you have chance look into this issue?

Michael

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1339
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: gcc11
« Reply #12 on: June 23, 2022, 07:23:08 AM »
I'll start again. First get rebuilt what I had first. As a test

yuzhichang

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: gcc11
« Reply #13 on: August 09, 2022, 07:38:33 AM »
Any update on this?

Michael

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1339
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: gcc11
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2022, 03:27:13 PM »
Going to start all over again, with a more historical build system - and rebuild gcc 4.7.4 again.

If I can't recreate that - as I was doing in 2014 - I have little confidence going forward.

Testing...

Michael

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1339
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: gcc11
« Reply #15 on: August 16, 2022, 07:08:22 AM »
Almost there. Seems I discovered something 8+ years ago - to get it to complete, but cannot recall what that was.

Sigh.

Michael

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1339
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: gcc11
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2022, 12:21:59 PM »
Sadly, keep running into barriers. Will continue next week.